MEDICINE

The Difference Between a Treatment and a Vaccine

Saul

Historically, a vaccine prevents the person who is inoculated from becoming infected with the disease it protects against.
Presently, this is still the definition held by the CDC and in medical literature.

Moderna and Pfizer, manufactures drugs labeled and distributed as a “vaccine”. Their own websites and trial data indicate that those products are not a vaccine. Indeed, in fine print they state as much.
These two drugs are NOT vaccines. They are classified by their manufacturers as gene therapy.

Mass media literature in the form of press releases and public service announcements, redefine the term vaccine to mean an inoculation which lessens the symptoms of a disease. If lawsuits are made against these agencies in the future, they could fall back on the language used which is vague and presently misleading.

Concerned doctors in the medical community have voiced their opinion about the disregard for patient informed consent.

It has not been made clear to the public that:

The drugs are not a vaccine.
The drugs are intended to treat symptoms.
No immunity is granted.
Final trials have not been completed.
There is not enough data to suggest any current or long term safety.
FDA Emergency approval does not indicate safety of treatment.
FDA Emergency approval does not suggest it will be approved after the emergency status is removed.

The technology used for these drugs have never been used in humans successfully before and drugs of their type have never received FDA approval. As of this date, Moderna has not brought any drugs successfully to market.

My opinion is that this drug has been pushed forward in ill will without proper oversight and against established medical treatment processes. They know most people don’t understand the relationship between SARS-COV-2 and Covid-19. They wordsmith their language to confuse a fearful public into receiving medication they would otherwise refuse. Voices from the medical community that have sought to provide clarification are vehemently censored.

According to FDA literature, part of the approval for this drug depended on establishing that no other treatments are available. Censorship has played a role in making sure that happened. In contradiction to this claim, hospitals and physicians are prescribing existing drugs which have been established to be effective.

Ironically, the current scenario has granted the drug makers immunity from liability. Yet their drugs do not the same against the virus. They also now have access to a far larger pool of test subjects which would otherwise be unavailable. The public has given even their bodies up for experimentation with nothing given in return.

People think that Covid-19 is the virus. Covid-19 is the presentation of symptoms, not a virus. Coughing, shortness of breath, etc, these are the symptoms which are called, Covid-19. Vaccination materials state intended protection against Covid-19, not the virus. This is an important distinction. SARS-COV-2 is the virus. When you catch SARS-COV-2, you may present with Covid-19. The injections do not protect against SARS-COV-2 and this is clearly stated in all the drug manufacturers documentation.

This means that you can still catch and transmit SARS-COV-2 after receiving the injections. It is not clear how much of the virus is spread in someone with minimal or no Covid-19 symptoms.

The general public who are in favor of these drugs might not care so much as to how the injection works, only that they might be spared from the illness. Even if it’s only hope, they might figure it’s better than nothing. Of course, how they got the framing for that perception and what that says about the people who created that perception is my concern. If the public understood how easily the details could have been made clear would they still be just as enthusiastic. No reasonable person would trust an organization who lies and misrepresents their product.